Dyson Technology Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
最近更新时间：2025-06-16
案件信息
案件号：ilnd-1:2025-cv-00575
状态：open
提交时间：2025-04-04 00:00:00
诉讼类型：
律所：
原告：Dyson Technology Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
| # | 日期 | 案件进程 |
| 61 | 2025-04-04 | (Exhibit A) |
| 60 | 2025-04-04 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited regarding order on motion for entry of default, text entry, 44 |
| 59 | 2025-04-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion 40 for entry of default and default judgment against all defendants. All remaining defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, an order of default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be filed on or before 4/18/25. If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. Mailed notice |
| 58 | 2025-04-03 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Dyson Technology Limited as to certain defendant |
| 57 | 2025-03-20 | (Exhibit 1) |
| 56 | 2025-03-20 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 41 |
| 55 | 2025-03-20 | (Exhibit 1) |
| 54 | 2025-03-20 | MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment 40 |
| 53 | 2025-03-20 | (Exhibit A) |
| 52 | 2025-03-20 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for entry of default, MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for default judgment as to all Defendants |
| 51 | 2025-03-20 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Dyson Technology Limited as to certain defendants |
| 50 | 2025-03-14 | NEW PARTIES: huangxiaolingok, Joopeer, loveforveortakeme, Good Luck147 and LUCKYWANG added to case caption. |
| 49 | 2025-03-13 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings on 3/13/2025. Mailed notice |
| 48 | 2025-03-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction [31] is granted. Plaintiff's filings establish that it has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this action and the motion, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed on behalf of any defendant. Enter preliminary injunction order. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that all defendants listed on Schedule A are added to the court's docket within five business days. The Clerk is requested to unseal any previously-sealed documents. If plaintiff intends to move for an order of default and default judgment, plaintiff shall file its motion on or before 4/17/25. The 3/10/25 tracking status hearing is stricken and re-set to 4/28/25 at 9:00 a.m. (to track the case only, no appearance is required). Mailed notice |
| 47 | 2025-02-28 | (Exhibit A) |
| 46 | 2025-02-28 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion for entry of a preliminary injunction 31. In connection with that motion, plaintiff must serve all remaining defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by or before March 11, 2025." If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. For the reasons stated in the Court's order entering the TRO, the TRO is extended to and including the date upon which the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice |
| 45 | 2025-02-28 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited regarding text entry, 35 |
| 44 | 2025-02-21 | (Exhibit A) |
| 43 | 2025-02-21 | Declaration of Andrew D. Burnham |
| 42 | 2025-02-21 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dyson Technology Limited as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 2/21/2025, answer due 3/14/2025. |
| 41 | 2025-02-21 | DECLARATION of Justin T. Joseph regarding memorandum in support of motion 32 |
| 40 | 2025-02-21 | MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for preliminary injunction 31 |
| 39 | 2025-02-21 | (Exhibit A) |
| 38 | 2025-02-21 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for preliminary injunction |
| 37 | 2025-02-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Plaintiff's motion for extension of TRO 27 is granted. The TRO entered on 1/29/25 is extended to 2/26/25. Mailed notice |
| 36 | 2025-02-07 | DECLARATION of Justin T. Joseph regarding memorandum in support of motion 28 |
| 35 | 2025-02-07 | MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of extension of time 27 |
| 34 | 2025-02-07 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for extension of time of Temporary Restraining Order |
| 33 | 2025-02-05 | SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 32 | 2025-02-04 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio |
| 31 | 2025-01-29 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 4, ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, and expedited discovery 16, and motion for electronic service of process 21 are granted. Plaintiff's submissions establish that, were defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, plaintiff may file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall also be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, plaintiff's filings support proceeding on an ex parte basis at this time. Specifically, and as noted above, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, the Court finds that it is likely that their assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the evidence submitted by plaintiff shows a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit goods, and there is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Status hearing is set for 3/10/25 at 9:00 a.m. (to track the case only, no appearance is required). Mailed notice |
| 30 | 2025-01-22 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 22 |
| 29 | 2025-01-22 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery |
| 28 | 2025-01-22 | MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for temporary restraining order 16 |
| 27 | 2025-01-22 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 17 |
| 26 | 2025-01-22 | DECLARATION of Giles Samuel Lane regarding memorandum in support of motion 17 |
| 25 | 2025-01-22 | (Exhibit 1) |
| 24 | 2025-01-22 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 2 - Part 1 regarding declaration 19 |
| 23 | 2025-01-22 | (Exhibit 2-1) |
| 22 | 2025-01-22 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) |
| 21 | 2025-01-22 | MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 21 |
| 20 | 2025-01-21 | MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. |
| 19 | 2025-01-17 | (Exhibit 2) |
| 18 | 2025-01-17 | COMPLAINT filed by Dyson Technology Limited; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22966613. |
| 17 | 2025-01-17 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Schedule A regarding complaint 1 |
| 16 | 2025-01-17 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 1 - Part 1 regarding complaint 1 |
| 15 | 2025-01-17 | (Exhibit 1-1) |
| 14 | 2025-01-17 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for leave to file under seal |
| 13 | 2025-01-17 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 12 | 2025-01-17 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Dyson Technology Limited |
| 11 | 2025-01-17 | Notice of Claims involving Patents by Dyson Technology Limited |
| 10 | 2025-01-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Justin R. Gaudio |
| 9 | 2025-01-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Lawrence J. Crain |
| 8 | 2025-01-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Justin Tyler Joseph |
| 7 | 2025-01-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Andrew Daniel Burnham |
| 6 | 2025-01-17 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). |
| 5 | 2025-01-17 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 4 | 2025-01-17 | AMENDED complaint by Dyson Technology Limited against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 3 | 2025-01-17 | (Exhibit 2) |
| 2 | 2025-01-17 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Amended Schedule A regarding amended complaint 12 |
| 1 | 2025-01-17 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 1 regarding amended complaint 12 |
